Rating: 5.01 |
(Hint: Use number keys to rate)
(Hint: Use number keys to rate)
14.08.2013 - 14:04:46 <anon> agreed
14.08.2013 - 14:08:32 <anon> mulla on kakkaa housut täynnä koiran paskaa
14.08.2013 - 14:15:44 <anon> Hörpöttiii!
14.08.2013 - 14:19:13 <anon> So basically geeks and non-geeks are equal for 30% of the time, geeks are worse 50% of the time and only better about 20% of the time. CONCLUSION = Hire non-geek every time.
14.08.2013 - 14:22:35 <anon> Sillon ku geekki vielä itkee shelli scriptinsä ääressä non-geekki panee jo pilluun
14.08.2013 - 14:24:47 <anon> http://apina.biz/107258.gif
14.08.2013 - 14:35:56 <anon> hintti käytä numero näppäin to rate
14.08.2013 - 14:46:19 <anon> minullakin on paskaa housussa
14.08.2013 - 14:51:41 <anon> mikä toi geek on en osaa ruotsia?
14.08.2013 - 15:06:57 <anon> KIVA HERÄTÄ VITTU YÄUNILTA JA MENNÄ KEITTÄÄ VITTU KAHAVII MOCCAMASTERIL...
14.08.2013 - 15:12:11 <anon> kiva vittu lähtee Kelaan hakee toimeen tulo tukea kun vettä sataa kaata malla. no samalla voi käydä hakemassa jako mäen alepasta karjalaa. siinä tää työ päivä meneekin. t: Isäm Maam Pulustaja
14.08.2013 - 15:33:37 <anon> The axis "task size" is a bit weird. The task itself doesn't grow over time. I propose an alternative of "amount of compleated tasks" On an unrelated note the time-axis is usually portrayed on the horizontal axis, altho this is only a minor detail.
14.08.2013 - 15:53:46 <anon> task size kinda makes sense if you consider that soms tasks would be too small to automate, then the effort (time spent) would be larger for the geek
14.08.2013 - 15:54:29 <anon> i.e. for a task of size where the middle blue arrow points the geek would be in a loss
14.08.2013 - 16:25:00 <anon> <anon> task size kinda makes sense if you consider that soms tasks would be too small to automate, then the effort (time spent) would be larger for the geek <--- On the other hand, the geek would have a prepared script, or one that's easily modified to automate multiple tasks in the future.
14.08.2013 - 16:32:31 <anon> false. the real problem is that geeks go for over-complicated solutions ALL THE TIME, even for the simplest tasks. in the long run, they are the diametrical opposite of efficient pragmatics.
14.08.2013 - 16:38:49 <anon> geeks lose in life
14.08.2013 - 16:55:36 <anon> .. <--- On the other hand, the geek would have a prepared script, or one that's easily modified to automate multiple tasks in the future. <- well yeah, but that would increase task size
14.08.2013 - 17:42:20 <anon> Samaistuin miljoonan iffin voimalla.
14.08.2013 - 17:45:20 <anon> Graafin luku 101: Paljon toistoa -> Skripti voittaa. Jonkin verran toistoa -> Skripti häviää, mutta seuraavalla kerralla skripti voittaa (harvinainen toistuva keissi). Vähän toistoa -> Käsin kopionti.
14.08.2013 - 17:46:08 <anon> Esimerkkikeissi: Numeroiden kopiointi taulukosta toiseen pienellä formaatti muunnoksella. Skriptillä menee heti, mutta skriptin kirjoitusaika on pienillä tapauksilla pitempi kuin numeroiden copy/pasteaminen manuaalisesti.
14.08.2013 - 17:48:04 <anon> "<anon> The axis "task size" is a bit weird. The task itself doesn't grow over time." <- Retard. Learn to read the graph: With increasing task size, writing a script beats doing stuff manually.
14.08.2013 - 17:49:18 <anon> ...and essentially flatlines the time required for any reasonable size problem (when compared to manual labor).
14.08.2013 - 18:04:59 <anon> non-geek jatkaa onnellisesti töissään, geek sai kenkää kun teki softan hoitamaan asian puolestaan? yyyyy
14.08.2013 - 19:11:22 <anon> geek needs non geek to build
14.08.2013 - 20:15:03 <anon> That's assuming the script actually works. In real life they run the script then spend the rest of their lives troubleshooting problems it causes
14.08.2013 - 21:36:08 <anon> So basically geeks and non-geeks are equal for 30% of the time, geeks are worse 50% of the time and only better about 20% of the time. CONCLUSION = Hire non-geek every time.<--- only if the distribution of your tasks is uniform along the visible part of the axis
14.08.2013 - 23:22:56 <anon> bilu
15.08.2013 - 00:54:51 <anon> no de-bugging required? I'd like to see that where code works 1t time!
15.08.2013 - 03:19:08 <anon> You need to know when it is a time-saver to write the script
15.08.2013 - 03:20:59 <anon> Some geeks like to practice their judgement and script writing abilities on tasks of lesser frequency or importance
15.08.2013 - 03:23:14 <anon> This annoys the hell out of non-geeks
15.08.2013 - 03:30:28 <anon> But in the end, when I go to work, I do something that adds value to my employer (and its easy to measure). This include using a skillset usually characterized with geekiness but also social and other "non-geek" skills.
15.08.2013 - 03:31:01 <anon> Thats why I believe I'll never be out of work
15.08.2013 - 20:40:56 <anon> vitun siisti, ja tottakin
17.08.2013 - 11:38:45 <anon> lots of geeks here
19.10.2013 - 03:28:12 <anon> Yeah, Sure. Now Write A Script To Get Laid.
12.12.2013 - 13:41:00 <anon> 19.10.2013 - 03:28:12 <anon> Yeah, Sure. Now Write A Script To Get Laid. <-- Haha!
06.05.2014 - 11:46:11 <anon> this isnt really true. usually with these kind of aspies the time spent automating is far greater than the wastage will ever be
03.11.2016 - 07:25:17 <anon> How come non-geek have steady performance, but still able to make fun of geek's complicated method..? Graph FAILed. Wai mitä?
20.11.2016 - 10:43:15 <anon> miksköhän vitussa kuvaaja on laitettu noin että aika on pystyakselilla. tän on kyllä tehny joku vitun idiootti
15.02.2018 - 12:24:50 <anon> mehh is a haxxer. being haxxer is good thing yeyy.
24.10.2020 - 17:40:54 <anon> true geek ei ois alun alkaenkaan tehny mitään manuaalisesti ja ois pessy nuo kaikki
08.11.2025 - 17:20:24 <anon> Stop jerk off. I know a site where thousands of single girls are waiting to be fucked. Look at them: https://ja.cat/apn
27.11.2025 - 21:17:38 <anon> Quick sex with hot girls, come on in(click>>) https://ja.cat/finn ❤️
28.11.2025 - 03:51:41 <anon> ❤️ SEXCHAT with single girls > https://ja.cat/APINA
28.11.2025 - 11:13:10 <anon> Stop jerk off. I know a site where thousands of single girls are waiting to be fucked. Look at them: https://ja.cat/NU17