20.01.2024 - 12:31:37 <anon> I am sexy man. Look my nudes :3 http://jorma.maansiirtofirma.fi
20.01.2024 - 12:40:55 <anon> You cant prove the negative. Nobody can prove tha Santa Claus does not exist. The idiocy and childishness of religious morons is overwhelming
20.01.2024 - 12:57:54 <anon> täs menee tosi diippeihin
20.01.2024 - 13:04:45 <anon> Ransu on olemassa!
20.01.2024 - 13:36:54 <anon> Mikäli väität Jumalan olevan olemassa on velvollisuutesi todistaa se. Ei toisinpäin,
20.01.2024 - 13:48:01 <anon> 20.01.2024 - 12:40:55 You gotta be quite a moron if you cannot prove that santa claus does not exist.
20.01.2024 - 14:43:19 <anon> so we should just believe what bible that has been rewritten many times is the messenger of god intentions.
20.01.2024 - 14:44:25 <anon> And some muslims in long time a go just happened to meet the good and become a cult leaders gainin all the power and money with it.
20.01.2024 - 15:10:04 <anon> R.I.H. (Rot In Hell) Vladimir Putin (1952-2024)
20.01.2024 - 15:48:28 <anon> Russell's Teapot. Burden of proof lies on the one who makes a positive claim that something exists. Anything else leads to logical madness. Such as everyone owing me a million dollars unless they can prove me wrong.
20.01.2024 - 16:27:21 <anon> Go ahead and believe in your magical-man-in-the-clouds, just STOP making laws for the rest of us!!!
20.01.2024 - 17:24:06 <anon> Sir, your imaginary friend is a masochist. Let it die like all the others you don't believe in, it's just one more.
20.01.2024 - 17:54:25 <anon> Siksi olenkin agnostikko! Ateismin alalaji, jossa ei olla mulkkuja.
20.01.2024 - 18:02:03 <anon> Which one of the gods?
20.01.2024 - 18:38:16 <anon> "You cant prove the negative." say people who think they are smart
20.01.2024 - 19:22:28 <anon> Since he failed at elementary school, he decided to give up on logic and embrace religion
20.01.2024 - 20:42:31 <anon> 20.01.2024 - 17:54:25 <anon> Siksi olenkin agnostikko! Ateismin alalaji, jossa ei olla mulkkuja. <- Agnostisismi ei ole ateismin alalaji, senkin idiootti. Molemmat ovat täysin eri käsitteitä. Voit olla uskovainen agnostikko. Kuten termistä voisi päätelläkin, agnostisismi viittaa tietoon. Agnostikko siis vastaa kysymykseen "onko mahdollista tietää jumalan olemassaoloa" eikä itse kysymykseen "onko jumalaa olemassa".
21.01.2024 - 00:56:08 <anon> in this moment i am euphoric
21.01.2024 - 14:52:48 <anon> Jos kysymystä voi todistaa oikeaksi tai vääräksi, kysymys ei ole tieteellinen. Eli siitä vain, uskokaa mihin haluatte mutta pitäkää se omana tietonanne.
21.01.2024 - 18:55:20 <anon> Pastafaris love pesto and pajautus
21.01.2024 - 22:09:57 <anon> heard jesus is too liberal for the hatemongers
22.01.2024 - 15:13:51 <anon> jebe?
03.02.2024 - 16:28:51 <anon> Absence of evidence is not evidence of absence.
26.03.2024 - 23:29:15 <anon> Vittu miten typerä pelle
08.09.2024 - 11:37:18 <anon> Kaikilla ei vaan älykkyys riitä, tai sitten kuolema pelottaa raukkaa :(
08.11.2025 - 19:15:52 <anon> Stop jerk off. I know a site where thousands of single girls are waiting to be fucked. Look at them: https://ja.cat/apn
27.11.2025 - 19:54:47 <anon> Quick sex with hot girls, come on in(click>>) https://ja.cat/finn ❤️
28.11.2025 - 03:40:41 <anon> ❤️ SEXCHAT with single girls > https://ja.cat/APINA
28.11.2025 - 07:14:48 <anon> Stop jerk off. I know a site where thousands of single girls are waiting to be fucked. Look at them: https://ja.cat/NU17










