21.01.2026 - 21:43:37 <anon> Eka Vekara
21.01.2026 - 21:55:18 <anon> Logical fallacy: 1) They already sank or confiscated most of the fleet. 2) Who the fuck would go out on a drugboat knowing that the US navy have surrounded Venezuela for months. 3) They yoinked the president so now the droglords have no leader to arrange the smugrouts with
21.01.2026 - 22:13:41 <anon> They smart.. Go boat and BOOM. Nada boata!
21.01.2026 - 23:11:50 <anon> Why would usa lie to people? Trust your coverments! TRUST FFS!!!
22.01.2026 - 06:54:09 <anon> Idiot poster.
22.01.2026 - 08:55:44 <anon> Leftist "fishing boats"...
22.01.2026 - 09:17:36 <anon> hilarious take
22.01.2026 - 09:30:23 <anon> Yeah drugs to america with an inflatable boat on a 3000 kilometer journey. Must require twenty refueling on the way... Very safe also.
22.01.2026 - 09:31:34 <anon> You americunts have became the most stupid asholes that have ever walked the earth.
22.01.2026 - 13:54:39 <anon> Or fishers run out of drugs to carry
22.01.2026 - 13:58:15 <anon> Yes, you can thank president Donald Trump
22.01.2026 - 17:36:10 <anon> Trump solves everything. And creates a lot new ones (mainly)
22.01.2026 - 18:19:35 <anon> Ever notice the production of drugs in Afganistan never declined between it being ruled by the Taliban, Yanks, Taliban.
23.01.2026 - 01:03:46 <anon> A lot of whatif's surrounding this on the Venezuelan end. Maybe better question would be: Did it make the drug problem better in US? And the answer is no, it did not have any effect. Logical deduction is that Venezuela was not the cause of fentanyl issues in US.
23.01.2026 - 12:47:08 <anon> Drug trade stopped, no more drug boats labelled "fishing boats" can be stopped.