Rating: 7.09 |
(Hint: Use number keys to rate)
(Hint: Use number keys to rate)
24.01.2026 - 19:13:01 <anon> No siis. On sitä hölmömpiäkin ehdotuksia kuultu mutta hieman haastavat määritelmät ja vähän turhat, vaikka kaikki sais vähentää yhteisesti sovitun könttäsumman verotuksesta niin lopulta verot olis kuitenkin about samat.
24.01.2026 - 19:13:46 <anon> what is VAT?
24.01.2026 - 20:48:46 <anon> If companies payed taxes on revenue 95% of all businiess would go bankrupt, what kind of moron wrote this stupid shit?
24.01.2026 - 21:31:18 <anon> https://apina.biz/21309
24.01.2026 - 21:51:46 <anon> Oikeiston talousosaajat taas asialla , vitun pellet
24.01.2026 - 22:13:41 <anon> Someone seems not to know what revenue is.
25.01.2026 - 00:24:26 <anon> indeed
25.01.2026 - 02:06:33 <anon> stupid dipshit. if they have to pay tax on the revenue, companies that are close to their profit margin (operating close to loss) will immediately go into heavy loss and go bankrupt.
25.01.2026 - 03:45:51 <anon> 25.01.2026 02:34:09 Companies ARE making a profit you dense tard, but taxes on REVENUE would EXCEED the profit portion, THAT would lead to a loss and bankrupcy, adults can't even understand basic math?
25.01.2026 - 05:26:22 <anon> Älä kerro kokoomuslaisille tätä kikkaa!
25.01.2026 - 15:30:19 <anon> Facepalm. If a company buys parts for $70, adds $30 value by assembly, and sells to you at $100, you really think they gonna pay income tax on the whole $100? No, they would let you buy the parts separately and then sell you the assembly for $30. Their revenue then will be the $30 and the taxes on that anyway. They are not as stupid as you, Lisa.
25.01.2026 - 17:59:11 <anon> Vaikka sitten näin kunhan verot putoo
28.01.2026 - 00:33:29 <anon> Ne verot joutuu maksaa joka tapauksessa.